Bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) resulted in similar progression-free survival (PSA) and reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) compared with enzalutamide among men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), according to the results of a phase 2 trial published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.1

“The TRANSFORMER trial is unique in that it compares two treatments with diametrically opposite effects on the androgen receptor therapeutic target,” the authors wrote.

Androgen deprivation therapy is the standard of care for prostate cancer but can result in treatment resistance due to adaptive upregulation of the androgen receptor. BAT aims to address this by rapidly cycling the patient from high to low serum testosterone.

The phase 2 TRANSFORMER study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02286921) randomly assigned 195 patients with asymptomatic metastatic CRPC to receive monthly BAT as testosterone cypionate or enzalutamide. The primary endpoint was PFS and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), PSA, and safety. Crossover was allowed at progression.


Continue Reading

At baseline, the median age was 71;  87% of patients were White, 7% were Black or African American, 3% were Asian, 1% were American Indian, and 3% were of other race. The majority of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Most patients had a Gleason score of 7, 8, or 9-10. The mean baseline PSA was 47.45.

Treatment with BAT and enzalutamide resulted in similar outcomes. During a median follow-up of 31.9 months, the PFS was a median of 5.7 months in both arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% CI, 0.83-1.55; P =.42).

The median OS was also not significantly different, with a median of 32.9 months with BAT compared with 29.0 months with enzalutamide (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.66-1.39; P =.80).

In subgroup analyses, both PFS and OS favored BAT among men with a short (defined as less than 6 months) response to abiraterone.

Crossover occurred, primarily as a result of radiographic progression. The median OS among patients who crossed over to enzalutamide was 37.1 months compared with 30.2 months among patients who crossed over to BAT (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.36-1.28; P =.23).

Grade 3 to 4 adverse events occurred more frequently with enzalutamide at 35.1% compared with 28.1% with BAT. The rate of serious adverse events was similar at 19.1% and 20.6% with BAT and enzalutamide, respectively. Fatigue was more common with enzalutamide, affecting 48.5% at grade 1 to 2 and 7.2% of patients at grade 3 to 4, compared with 31.5% of patients receiving BAT who developed grade 1 to 2 fatigue.

The authors concluded that “TRANSFORMER establishes meaningful clinical activity of BAT and supports additional study to determine its optimal clinical integration.”

Reference

Denmeade SR, Wang H, Agarwal N, et al. TRANSFORMER: A randomized phase II study comparing bipolar androgen therapy versus enzalutamide in asymptomatic men with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. Published online February 22, 2021. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.02759

This article originally appeared on Cancer Therapy Advisor

Source: Renal & Urology News

Leave a Reply

ArabicChinese (Simplified)EnglishFrenchGermanItalianJapanesePortugueseRussianSpanish

[mc4wp_form id="449"]